Online theft forces University system to rethink security
Mon, December 17, 2007
Posted in Alaska News
An analysis by USA Today shows electronic record theft nearly tripled last year. The University of Alaska, Fairbanks wasn’t immune.
Ben Markus, KUAC - Fairbanks
Comments
One Comment to “Online theft forces University system to rethink security”
Top Stories
- APOC dismisses complaint against the state
- Investigation into Monegan firing gets underway
- Ted Stevens faces tough Republican primary
- Ballot Measure 1: “The gambling initiative”
- Methane tanker crash vents explosive gas, snarls Mat-Su traffic
- Ballot Measure 4 hottest political topic, most expensive issue
- Republican primary for U.S. House busiest in years
- Prosecutors make fresh allegations against Senator Stevens
- Steven’s lawyers move to dismiss charges against him
- Alaska lobbyist charged with failure to report his business activities
Categories
Browse by Day
Archives
APRN Stations
- Anchorage - KNBA
- Anchorage - KSKA
- Barrow - KBRW
- Bethel - KYUK
- Chevak - KCUK (FM 88.1)
- Dillingham - KDLG
- Fairbanks - KUAC
- Fort Yukon - KZPA (AM 900)
- Galena - KIYU
- Haines - KHNS
- Homer - KBBI
- Juneau - KTOO
- Kenai - KDLL
- Ketchikan - KRBD
- Kodiak - KMXT
- Kotzebue - KOTZ
- McGrath - KSKO
- Petersburg - KFSK
- Sand Point - KSDP
- Sitka - KCAW
- St. Paul - KUHB
- Unalakleet - KNSA (AM 930)
- Unalaska - KIAL
- Valdez - KCHU
- Wrangell - KSTK
-
Search
-
datebook49.com
APRN Archives
APRN Programs
Latest Participation
Patrick Oulton -- No, he noticed all the liberals calling in asking the same question.
Jake -- Be careful to the ads you listen to put out by the mines. One ad says that Ballot Measure 4...
Llyod -- Clean Water,Why is Nana allowing Reddog to pollute their streams are they making so much...
edward l ward III -- To all alaskans preparing to vote on ballot measure 4. Don’t be deceived...
APRN.org
Related Sites
Alaska Public Radio Network (APRN) is a public service of Alaska Public Telecommunications, Inc. (APTI)
3877 University Dr | Anchorage AK 99508 | 907-550-8400 | Copyright ©2004-2007 APTI
Podcast Powered by podPress (v8.2)


I think a little background on this item may be useful for folks to consider whether the technology, the user, and/or the organizational culture which contributes to abuse of privacy and then how to go about solving the problem.
The UAF KuC computer breach referred to is –
UAF investigating breach of Kuskokwim Campus server, The Associated Press
Last Modified: April 20, 2006 at 04:30 PM
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/ap_alaska/story/7645779p-7557468c.html
However, the computer break-ins were actually reported to campus administration in December 2000.
Prior to that, at least by the fall semester of 2000, there was no firewall for the Kuskokwim servers and computers. Social security numbers for students were listed publicly. The UAF administrative computers were directly connected to the local campus (sometimes UAF techs came to service the server). Pornographic websites were left as home pages on public machines.
I was successful in getting the Social Security numbers removed but unsuccessful in getting security improved. IT support was self-taught which can be useful, but does not ensure a knowledge of basic privacy, security systems, and law.
The campus director at that time (who had never taught at the university level) insisted that students in computer labs double-up on computers. Why? It would increase enrollments without paying for increased faculty or paying for extra classes. Why the insistence to double classes? First semester students were required to take 19 credit hours (not the usual 12 or 15) of classes because “if you don’t keep them busy they just get into trouble.”
In January 2001 entire directories of files for targeted faculty vanished from the network.
Server performance continued to be poor. Even some basic business technology teaching was impossible due to ad hoc remedies for spam. Eventually the hard drive crashed and thousands of dollars spent to recover some of the data, too late for many students that year.
In May 2006, after the breach was reported to the public, the University of Alaska Fairbanks received an award of cybersecurity excellence by the Dept of Homeland Security and the National Security Agency.
from the press release
I do not believe that people in the United States changed their definition of privacy after 9-11, as Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of National Intelligence said recently. I do wonder why the abuse of information and technology at rural campuses was allowed to continue for so long (at least 5 years). I do hope UAF/UAA re-thinks their interactions within the entire university community.